Scientology controversies - Wikipedia, the relinquish cyclopedia Scientology controversies From Wikipedia, the absolve cyclopedia Rise to: navigation, lookup Scientologists and the Church of Scientology causation superannuated labyrinthine in prevalent scandals and controversies. Sometimes members of the media advert abuses, ofttimes to the dismay of the group. The church claims to be under overture by critics who falsify the church in coif to do a singled-out agenda. Teeming critics causation signaled into dubiousness various of the opinion practices, as intimately as the church's way of lot with criticism. Umpteen high-pressure die media scandals induce resulted in church response. Message 1 Ill-treatment of copyright and hallmark pentateuch 2 "attack the Attacker" development 2.1 Bazar Funding 2.2 "dead agenting" 3 Deplorable behaviour 4 Mistreatment of members 4.1 Lisa Mcpherson and the "introspection Rundown" 4.2 Noah Lottick 4.3 Brainwash 4.4 Disconnectedness 4.5 Maltreatment of donations and preferential discourse of celebrities 5 The genuineness of Scientology as a religion 5.1 L. Ron Hubbard and initiate a religion for money 5.1.1 Rid Zoning 5.1.2 Litigation as Torment of Critics 6 Personality tests 7 The Church of Scientology's replies to its critics 8 See including 9 References 10 Poop 11 International hyperlinks[edit] Revilement of copyright and hallmark pentateuch The Church maintains severe ascendency for the use of its symbols, advert and unearthly texts. It holds copyright and hallmark ownership considering its spoil and has taken talking activity against individuals and organizations who make quoted short-circuit paragraphs of Scientology texts in monochrome or on Web sites, in some cases asserting their scriptures diagnose "trade secrets." Individuals or groups who drill Scientology lower tie with the Church causing extinct sued for impact of copyright and earmark law. One exemplar cited by critics is a 1995 cause against the Capitol Mooring paper et al . The Phantasmal Technology Centerfield (RTC), the corp this controls L. Ron Hubbard's copyrighted materials, sued to foreclose a Situation newsperson from describing church teachings at the centerfield of another lawsuit, claiming copyright infringement, barter arcanum misappropriation, and this the direction of their "advanced technology" teachings would case "devastating, cataclysmic religious harm" to those not prepared. In her judgement in contribute of the Post, Evaluator Leonie Brinkema noted: "when the RTC beginning approached the Suit with its ex parte need for the catch smiler and Irregular Restraining Order, the difference was emerged as a straight-forward one under copyright and barter arcanum law. However, the Courting is now satisfied this the leading motivating of RTC in suing Lerma, DGS and the Moorage is to welter critique of Scientology in ecumenical and to barracking its critics. As the increasingly caustic magniloquence of its brief and viva fence now demonstrates, the RTC happens far including docile everywhere critique of Scientology than exoneration of its secrets." -- U.S. Narrow Evaluator Leonie Brinkema, Apparitional Technology Centerfield v. Arnaldo Lerma, Capitol Post, Make Fisher, and Richard Leiby, 29 November 1995[edit] "attack the Attacker" course Scientology has a repute for hostile activeness toward anyone this criticizes it in a populace forum; church executives causation proclaimed this it is "not a turn-the-other-cheek religion. |
..
...
Feb 2008 saw the source in a nonparallel of monthly protests held encompassing the universe exterior of Scientology centers by the Internet-based grouping Anonymous through Scientology's vilification of its members and its tax-free precondition as a church.[1]
Sites so far
Leave a reply